A cross sectional study on gender, site distribution and prosthetic options in patients rehabilitated with dental implants

Purpose & Aim: This study aim to collect data regarding patients gender distribution , site , treatment option instituted in a dental training institution over a period of three months. This study investigates the interplay based on gender, site distribution, prosthetic, and crown selection in dental implants, aiming to enhance our understanding of the multiple factors influencing treatment outcomes. Method: In the conducted cross-sectional study, data were collected from completed cases over a period of 3 months at the Department of Prosthodontics, Dental College And Hospital in Chennai. The study specifically examined gender, site distribution, prosthetic choices and crown selection in dental implants. A comprehensive analysis was undertaken by reviewing patient records and treatment histories. Data analysis utilized descriptive statistics. Results: Gender distribution revealed a balanced representation, with 50% females and 50% males. Site-specific variations demonstrated diverse implant locations, with mandibular posteriors (41.46%) and maxillary anteriors (30.48%) being predominant. Prosthetic trends indicated a preference for single-unit restorations (58.10%), while screw-retained crowns were the predominant choice (71.60%). This cross sectional analysis allowed for the identification of diverse patterns within each category. Limitations: The study is conducted over a brief time frame to obtain quick insights and initial findings. Due to constraints, the pilot study is carried out with a small sample to provide an initial understanding before a larger-scale investigation.The sample size is very small pertaining to only one unit. Conclusion: The findings from this study contribute valuable insights for clinicians to refine treatment strategies, acknowledging the importance of gender-specific considerations, varied implant sites, and evolving prosthetic preferences in achieving optimal patient outcomes. The results reveal no evidence of gender bias, with the mandibular posteriors and maxillary anteriors emerging as the most frequently encountered locations. Single-unit crowns were frequently chosen, with screw-retained restorations being the predominant option.