Receiving the right political system for afghanistan
International Journal of Development Research
Receiving the right political system for afghanistan
Received 27th May, 2023 Received in revised form 29th June, 2023 Accepted 20th July, 2023 Published online 29th August, 2023
Copyright©2023, Farahuddin Chaghaty. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This research, which has focused on finding a suitable political system for Afghanistan, has described discussions such as (explaining the concept of political system and structure, parliamentary system, advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary system, presidential system, advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary system and criticism of the current political system of Afghanistan). At the beginning of the research, we will get acquainted with the familiar discussion of the political system and structure, the comparison of the parliamentary system and the presidential system. In the era of globalization, countries experienced different systems from the centralized presidential system to the decentralized federal system, which in their nature have opponents and but the case and goal we are looking for is to get the right system, most of the scientists and writers expressed their opinion that the parliamentary system was more efficient in most of the countries that are transitioning towards modern democracy, compared to the centralized presidential system. End and the result that magnifies the current research is that the parliamentary system and the presidential system each have their own positive and negative points (advantages and shortcomings) that both of these systems are now clearly experienced in most countries of the world, which is a good example. The presidential system can be seen in the United States and a good example of the parliamentary system can be seen in the British political structure. But! The experiences gained from the experience of the parliamentary system in the majority of countries indicate that a non-centralized parliamentary system can be a good answer in the discussion of good governance and the experience of modern democracy in multi-ethnic and multi-racial societies like Afghanistan. According to the theory of separation of powers, the parliamentary system has better flexibility than the presidential system, which can prevent the tension between the two main branches of government (legislature, executive) and bring stability to most societies.